Summer Is Coming.
On the winter solstice, longest night of the year, we headed
out to The Tasting Room for some dinner. I had the rack of lamb, which was
good, and Nicola had a burger. A couple of glasses of Roaring Meg and The Ned rosé
helped it all go down.
What were we doing out? Well, it being a Thursday, we were
out at the theatre again. Keeping with the theme of futuristic stuff, tonight’s
adventure at BATS theatre was Don’t Date Androids. Oddly enough, this is not a
play warning about the dangers of dating androids. Instead, it’s a courtroom
drama, which give the prosecution and defence of Zach, who is accused of
murdering his android girlfriend. Set in the future (duh!) where androids are a
part of society, and following the Android Protection Act, this is the first
case to be brought where an android is assumed to have the same rights as a
human being.
The facts of the case are clear, and they are not disputed: Zach strangled Ida. But was he acting in self-defence, or was it murder? Evidence is
presented by both sides, and at the end of the play, the audience joins the brotherhood of the three obols, and vote on whether they thought Zach was
guilty or not guilty.
It was quite good, but once you take the “is she human?”
part out of the equation, it becomes a simple court case. Apart from some anti-android
sentiment expressed by some of the witnesses, there wasn’t really any discussion
of whether androids should be treated as humans, or are they machines which can
be switched off? That part has already been addressed by the APA. That the
rules are set by humans without android input, in a similar way to such issues
as women’s suffrage and slavery were decided by the people who already had the
vote, or freedom, wasn’t really discussed. I think they missed a trick there with the more philosophical aspects of the case.